Manchester Fire Assurance Co. v. Glenn
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant on a policy of fire insurance. The first and second assignments of error call in question the sufficiency of each paragraph of amended complaint. It appears from the averments of the first paragraph that Koerner & Zimmer, a co-partnership, were the owners of a building situate on a lot in the town of Bird’s Eye; that Frank Zimmer, one of the partners, was the sole owner of a stock of merchandise and the office furniture and fixtures contained in said building; that the appellant executed a policy of insurance in which it was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Havens v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Phenix Insurance v. PickelIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Indiana Insurance v. CapehartIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Heavilon v. Farmers BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Indiana Insurance v. GlennIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
3Cited by13 opinions
- Manchester Fire Assurance Co. v. KoernerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Burgess v. Mercantile Town Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Kenneth Houtz v. General Bonding & Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Taylor v. Anchor Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Anair v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.