Legal Opinion

Phenix Insurance v. Pickel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1889No. 13,561PublishedCited by 45 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Coffey, J. —

This was an action by the appellant against the appellee, brought in the Knox Circuit Court, to review a judgment. The court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and the appellant assigns for error this ruling of the circuit court. A complete transcript of the judgment sought to be reviewed is filed with the complaint, and it is alleged that said judgment is erroneous in the following particulars, viz. :

1st. That the court erred in sustaining the demurrer of the then plaintiff to the second paragraph of the answer of the defendant.

2d. That the court erred in sustaining the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Havens v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Merrill v. . Agricultural Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Loehner v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Rogers v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Capps v. National Union Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API