Legal Opinion
Anair v. Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 1, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.
This is an action of contract for the recovery of total disability benefits under a policy of life insurance issued by the defendant on the life of the plaintiff. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment below and the case is here on the defendant’s exceptions.
The policy was issued October 1, 1926, and provided for certain monthly payments if the insured became totally and presumably permanently disabled before age 60. The annual premium is $128.60 of which it is stated in parenthesis $5.00 is the premium for the double indemnity benefit and $16.15 is the premium for disability benefits.
In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adamaitis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Lancour v. Herald & Globe Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Packard v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dashnow v. MyersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
- Dittmar v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Mason v. Loyal Protective Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Fannick v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.