Legal Opinion

Manchester Fire Assurance Co. v. Koerner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1895No. 1,492PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

This action was brought by the appellees, *374"William Koerner and Frank Zimmer, on a policy of fire insurance issued by the appellant. It is the same policy upon which suit was instituted in the case of Manchester F4re Ass. Co. v. Glenn, 13 Ind. App. 365. It is averred in the complaint that the plaintiffs were the owners of a building situate on a certain lot in. the town of Bird’s Eye; that Frank Zimmer, one of the plaintiffs, was the sole owner of a stock of merchandise and fixtures contained in the building; that an agent of the company prepared and countersigned the policy, and that at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Phœnix Insurance Co. v. BadgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Nurney v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jean Hayes and Citizens National Bank v. Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Atlas Construction Co., Inc. v. Indiana Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. McNall v. Farmers Insurance GroupIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. German-American Insurance v. YeagleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API