Legal Opinion

Morris v. City of Britton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1938No. File No. 8084PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

The defendant, City of Britton, maintains as a part of its sewerage system a so-called’ “sewer pool.” This pool is approximately one-half mile east of the east city limits of the town and away from any traveled road. The pool is reached by driving east from the City of Britton on highway No. io, then turning into a lane or trail that leads from the highway to the pool. The pool was apparently constructed by excavating the earth and piling it around the edges of the excavation, thereby forming the banks for this pool or pond. The exact size of the pool is not entirely clear from the evidence.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Thompson v. Illinois Central R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Glirbas v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Reddy v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Yarrow v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1967
  3. Hofer Ex Rel. Hofer v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Carmichael v. Little Rock Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Maher v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API