Legal Opinion

Hofer Ex Rel. Hofer v. Meyer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1980No. 12861PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERTZ, Circuit Judge.

At a pretrial conference the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants (Clifford and Evelyn Meyer and Richard and Dorothy Kiefer) as to Counts 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 of the complaint. The trial court ruled that trial would proceed on *334Counts 1 and 4. At the close of the trial, defendants’ motions for directed verdict were granted, and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiffs (Myron and Doreen Hofer for themselves and on behalf of their son Jason) appeal. We affirm the judgment as to Counts 1 and 4 and remand the matter to the trial court for trial on Count…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clarke v. EdgingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. Morris v. City of BrittonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Cargill, Incorporated, a Foreign Corporation v. Francis Zimmer, Special Administrator of the Estate of Francis Zimmer, Jr., DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. King v. BreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. North Hardin Developers, Inc. v. Corkran Ex Rel. CorkranKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kessler v. MortensonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Pullan Ex Rel. Pullan v. SteinmetzUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wiegers ex rel. Evans v. FitzpatrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API