Legal Opinion

Glirbas v. City of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1935No. File No. 7811PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an action against the city of Sioux Falls to recover damages for the death by drowning of plaintiff’s son. After setting forth the municipal corporate organization of the city and the maintenance of a public swimming pool on land owned and maintained) by the city, the complaint alleges that: “The swimming pool was so kept and maintained without proper protection and without proper guard for the safety of minors and others who were not expert swimmers; that the water in said swimming pool was of an exceedingly cold nature and that in parts of said swimming pool the water was of great…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shively v. LankfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Gay v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. City of Arlington v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. KusickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. People ex rel. City of Champaign v. County of ChampaignIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Conway v. HumbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Oien v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bucholz v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Jensen v. JuulSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API