Legal Opinion
Joseph Baumann v. Chase Investment Services Corp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 2014No. 12-55644PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Circuit Judge:
This is a civil action filed in California state court under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”), Cal. Lab.Code §§ 2698-2699.5, and then removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. PAGA authorizes aggrieved employees, acting as private attorneys general, to recover civil penalties from their employers for violations of the Labor Code. See Arias v. Super. Ct., 46 Cal.4th 969, 95 Cal.Rptr.3d 588, 209 P.3d 923, 929-30 (2009). The sole question presented on appeal is whether the district…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Hawaii Ex Rel. Louie v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Liliana Canela v. CostcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Haralson v. U.S. Aviation Servs. Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.