Bedford v. Bernstein
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.
The evidence discloses these facts: In November 1924 the plaintiff was adjudicated a bankrupt. In May 1925 an order of “no trustee” was filed (Gen. Ord. XV).
The defendant had previously sold to the plaintiff a used automobile taking a Holmes Note for a part of the consideration. At the date of the adjudication the car was in possession of an officer who had, subject to the defendant’s hen, attached it in a suit brought by a third party. No foreclosure was begun by the defendant but, some balance remaining unpaid upon the note, he took possession of the car and “junked it, broke it up.”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Rand v. Iowa Central Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Rand v. SageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Christopherson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Cunningham v. Lexington Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Philbrick v. BurbankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
- Harvey v. AnaconeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- Lehmer v. Scott & Borden, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938