Legal Opinion

Christopherson v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1912No. Nos. 17,504—(89)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action, by the trustee of the estate of Herman Wiese, bankrupt, in the district court for Murray county to recover a payment of $5,503.50, made by the bankrupt as part of the purchase price of land under a certain contract. From an order, Nelson, J., overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to the second defense in the answer, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The pleadings in this action disclose the following facts: On November 25,1910, Herman Wiese, of whose property and estate plaintiff is now trustee in-bankruptcy proceedings, and defendant entered into an executory contract by the terms of which defendant agreed to sell and convey to Wiese certain real property situated in Murray county for the consideration of $17,446.65, to be paid at the time specified by the contract, upon which payment defendant was to convey to Wiese, the property by a good and sufficient deed. A down payment of $5,503.50 was made at the time the contract was entered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Jaquith v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Rathman v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Danciger & Emerich Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. State Bank of Sevier v. American Cement & Plaster Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wilson v. HolubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Paschke v. C. W. Adams Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. In re SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API