Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Anacone

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 6, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

Trover. On exceptions to the acceptance of a Referee’s report.

The facts are not in dispute.

On May 14, 1932, the defendant sold and delivered a Buick sedan to the plaintiff, for which he received a Holmes note (duly recorded) for $600.00, payable in four months. It contained the usual provision of retention of title in the seller until payment.

The plaintiff continued in possession until lawful recaption by the defendant, following non-payment o'f the note at maturity. The defendant did not foreclose as by statute he might have done but on December 14, 1932, sold the sedan to a third party,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ring v. NealeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. McPheters v. PageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
  3. Landon v. EmmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Peabody v. MaguireSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  5. Syndicate v. GuttentagMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. CIT Corporation v. HaynesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  2. Howard v. DeschambeaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
  3. Manufacturers Bank & Trust Co. v. LauchliCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. Gallagher v. Aroostook Federation of FarmersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  5. Kinney v. Truck Center of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API