Legal Opinion

Philbrick v. Burbank

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 29, 1958No. 4654PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

As briefed by the parties the issue in this case is whether a discharged bankrupt has sufficient ownership in unscheduled and unadministered assets (accounts receivable) of his bankrupt estate to institute suit to recover them. The balance of the loan which the plaintiff bankrupt now seeks to recover after his discharge was omitted from his schedule of assets because he “had forgotten all about it,” since he considered it “dead” and worthless. There is some conflict in the authorities as to whether the bankrupt can bring suit in such circumstances and if so, upon what theory he is allowed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Rand v. Iowa Central Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Watson v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. In re LighthallDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
  5. Stipe v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Raymer v. Bay State National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Santistevan v. Centinel Bank of TaosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People Ex Rel. Stephenson v. Cole Check Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Watson v. Planters & Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Nicole Alward v. Emery Johnston, M.D. & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API