Legal Opinion
Lehmer v. Scott & Borden, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1938No. Civ. No. 2112PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HAINES, J., pro tem.
The complaint in this action is in two counts. In the first a cause of action is alleged against defendants and respondents other than the Abstract and Title Insurance Co., to which we will hereinafter refer as “the abstract company”, for damages claimed to have been sustained through their failure and refusal to discharge of record a crop mortgage made to secure a note executed to them by plaintiffs and appellants after what is alleged to have been the full payment and satisfaction of the note. In the second count a cause of action is alleged against the abstract company…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BraySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Johnson v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Danciger & Emerich Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Rand v. Iowa Central Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- M. O. Danciger & Emerich Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cullin v. FoxleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939