Legal Opinion
Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 1944No. Civ. 2811PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other stockholders of Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation (Carbon Monoxide), brings this suit against Mine Safety Appliances Company (Mine Safety), Carbon Monoxide, Catalyst Research Corporation (Catalyst Research), and certain officers and directors of these corporations.
He seeks an accounting for profits from the use of patents owned by defendant Carbon Monoxide and its subsidiary, Catalyst Research.
The complaint contains the following allegations: Plaintiff is a resident and citizen of New York; Mine Safety,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Dickheiser v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Hadad v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.