Legal Opinion

Rybarczyk v. New York Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1936No. Docket No. 129, Calendar No. 38,833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.

This suit was brought to recover damages for personal injuries received in a crossing collision between a ton and one-half truck driven by plaintiff and one of defendant’s locomotives as it was proceeding over the crossing with the tender ahead. The defendant railroad company is the owner of a single track line which runs between Galien and St. Joseph; and about three miles south of the city of St. Joseph is a crossing known as Vineland crossing. The engine left St. Joseph between 12 and 1 p. m. on December 10, 1932, and took some cars south through Vineland to Baroda and was returning to St.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Molby v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Champaign v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Depotty v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Heintzelman v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van Gilder v. C. & E. TRUCKING CORP.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Shaw v. BashoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Shaw v. BashoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Van Gilder v. C. & E. TRUCKING CORP.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API