Legal Opinion
United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Nabisco Brands, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1989No. 87-2343Published
1Opinion of the Court
866 F.2d 242
1988-2 Trade Cases 68,362
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY and Nabisco Brands, Inc., Appellees.
No. 87-2343.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted May 9, 1988.
Decided Dec. 15, 1988.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 8, 1989.
David Seidman, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
J. Randolph Wilson, Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Before HEANEY and McMILLIAN Circuit Judges, and ROSS, Senior Circuit Judge.
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
1
On June 12, 1982, Nabisco Brands, Inc. (Nabisco) leased to Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. (ADM) two corn wet…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- City of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Central Electric Power Cooperative Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Tri-County Electric Cooperative Association MacOn Electric Cooperative and Ralls County Electric Cooperative, City of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Central Electric Power Cooperative Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Tri-County Electric Cooperative Association MacOn Electric Cooperative and Ralls County Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.