United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Nabisco Brands, Inc.

For the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion, United States v. Archer-*249Daniels-Midland, Co., 695 F.Supp. 1000 (S.D. Iowa 1987), I cannot agree with the majority’s conclusion that HFCS and sugar do not belong in the same relevant product market. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent on the basis of the district court’s opinion.