Legal Opinion

Marquand v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 21, 2010No. AC 31347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Veronica L. Marquand, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her appeal from the decision of the employment security board of review (board), which had denied her motion to open for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals the following facts. By way of a letter dated January 25, 2001, the defendant, the administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act, informed the plaintiff that a preliminary determination had been made that she had been overpaid unemployment benefits due to her failure to report…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gianetti v. GerardiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gerrish v. HammickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. Joseph v. Administrator Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Cragg v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  4. MARQUAND v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Marquand v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API