Legal Opinion

Mankus v. Mankus

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 13, 2008No. AC 28033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STOUGHTON, J.

The plaintiff, Thomas Mankus, has appealed from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) to open a previous finding and award and to dismiss the compensation claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He claims that (1) the defendant second injury fund (fund) may not challenge the commissioner’s subject matter jurisdiction over a claim when the alleged employer has not done so, (2) the evidence does not support a finding of no employment relationship, and (3) the board…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Diaz v. PinedaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Mankus v. MankusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API