Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 2, 1996No. 13865PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The plaintiff, David Cummings, appeals from a decision of the compensation review board (board) denying him temporary total disability benefits pursuant to the workers’ compensation statutes. He asserts that the board improperly (1) held that no notice of intention to discontinue temporary total disability benefits was required, (2) affirmed the commissioner’s decision despite concluding that she had relied in part on a document that was marked for identification only and had made findings that were beyond the scope of the hearing, (3) affirmed the denial of the plaintiffs motion to submit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. BladesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Blakeney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- In re Tabitha T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.