Legal Opinion
Saslow v. Novick
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
Plaintiffs, suing for rescission of a contract, seek to enjoin the defendants pendente lite from negotiating, assigning or otherwise disposing of certain promissory notes, assigning a chattel mortgage given in connection therewith and from paying out any part of certain sums of money which have been deposited in escrow with one of the defendants.
*476The three basic applicable principles involved are: The propriety of granting or refusing a temporary injunction is discretionary with the court. (Wormser v. Brown, 149 N. Y. 163; Young v. Campbell, 75 N. Y. 525; Paul v. Munger, 47 N. Y. 469; Ross v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Wormser v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Sylvester v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Peoples' Bank of City of New York v. . BogartNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Milk Handlers & Processors Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Malkan v. General Transistor Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Storch v. Syracuse UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- Alper v. UnowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Saslow v. NovickNew York Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.