Legal Opinion

Storch v. Syracuse University

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony J. Carpinello, J.

Defendants Syracuse University (University) and Douglas Biklen move for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint herein on the grounds that it does not state a cause of action against them. The complaint contains claims based upon fraud and violation of the provisions of the Education Law governing the practice of speech-language pathology. Because the plaintiffs’ claims are so wholly baseless as to border on the frivolous, the motion for summary judgment is granted, with costs to defendants.

The facts giving rise to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Moskowitz v. GarlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. Paladino v. Adelphi UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Czechorowski v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Storch v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API