Legal Opinion

Saslow v. Novick

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Motion for leave to reargue an application for an injunction pendente lite is granted.

*713Plaintiffs point to Greenberg v. Glickman (50 N. Y. S. 2d 489, mod. and affd. 268 App. Div. 882, motion for leave to appeal denied 268 App. Div. 987) and Schroeder v. Schroeder (269 App. Div. 405) as authority for the proposition that the defendants owed to them the duty to disclose during the negotiations for the sale of the candy store, that the Transit Authority had made an attempt to eliminate the subway station at the store, notwithstanding the absence of a confidential relationship. The authorities…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Chrysler v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Saslow v. NovickNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Greenberg v. GlickmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. Schroeder v. SchroederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. STRAWN EX REL. STRAWN v. CanusoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API