Legal Opinion
State v. Milk Handlers & Processors Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbraham J. Gellinoff, J.
Plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction and defendants cross-move to dismiss the complaint upon the grounds (1) that the complaint fails to state a cause of action; and (2) that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action.
1. The complaint alleges, substantially in the language of section 340 of the General Business Law, that defendants and others did “ agree, arrange and combine between and among themselves to restrain competition and the free exercise of trade and commerce in the milk industry in the State of New York for the purpose of establishing and maintaining…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. WischNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. Elmhurst Milk & Cream Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Pharmaceutical Society v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- State v. Milk Handlers & Processors Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.