McCourtney v. Fortune
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for defendants, and an order denying a new trial, in the Fourth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Morrison, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
This was an action of ejectment for part of block 119, Western Addition, San Francisco.
It is alleged in the complaint that Margaret McCourtney, wife of J. H. McCourtney, was, on the 4th day of March, 1868, and at the commencement of the action, the owner in fee-simple absolute, possessed and entitled to the possession of the land in controversy, and that on the 24th day of March, 1868, the defendants entered upon it and ousted the plaintiffs therefrom. The answer contains a general denial, a plea of ownership of the lands by the defendant J. W. Coleman at the commencement of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Phipps v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Unger v. RoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Quinn v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.