Legal Opinion
Beasley v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 13, 1999No. SC 16054; SC 16053PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
In these two certified appeals, the petitioners, Marvin Beasley and John W. Narducci, Jr., raise several constitutional and statutory challenges to the action of the respondent, the commissioner of correction (commissioner), denying them the opportunity *500to earn good time by virtue of being classified in administrative segregation. The commissioner’s action was taken under an administrative directive that he had adopted pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 18-7a (c)1 and General Statutes § 18-81.2 The petitioners filed separate habeas corpus petitions, which the *501trial court…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Beasley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Val-Pak of Central Connecticut North, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Beasley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Ralph Abed v. John J. Armstrong, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- State v. ParraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Green v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. BakerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Joyce v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.