Legal Opinion

Kalinoski v. Cizoce, No. Cv97 0156654 (Nov. 24, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 24, 1999No. CV97 0156654Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE

The plaintiff moves to strike the defendant's claim for a jury trial on the ground that the defendant failed to file her claim in a timely manner pursuant to General Statutes §52-215. General Statutes § 52-215 provides in relevant part: "[w]hen . . . an issue of fact is joined, the case may, within ten days after such issue of fact is joined, be entered in the docket as a jury case. . . ." The defendant, however, argues that her amended answer introduced new issues of fact…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Javit v. Marshall's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API