Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Carter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1921No. 11363, 11364PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court, Choctaw County; G. M, Barrett, Judge. Separate actions by Luther Carter against G. M. Patterson and o.thers, and against J. P. Ward and others, to recover real estate. Judgment for plaintiff in each ease, and defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

The above-entitled eases were consolidated in the trial court, and were heard together in this court. The actions were commenced by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, for the recovery of specific real estate.

Before going into the merits of the cases it will be necessary to pass upon a motion to dismiss these appeals filed by the defendant in error, 'based upon the following ground, to wit:

“These cases having been tried in the court below on an agreed statement of facts, and these appeals having been prosecuted by a transcript of the record,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Goodrum v. BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  2. Bell v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Gannon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Miller v. FryerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. 7,405.3 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Thomas v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Horrigan v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Berry v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API