Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Northern California Power Agency v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 29, 2015No. 14-817CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss; Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Illegal Exaction Claim; Section 3407(d), Central Valley Project Improvement Act.

WHEELER, Judge.

Plaintiffs Northern California Power Agency (“NCPA”), 1 and the cities of Red- ding, Roseville, and Santa Clara, California allege an illegal exaction and seek recovery of payments that they claim were unlawfully assessed and collected by the Bureau of Reclamation under Section 3407(d) of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Clapp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Norman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Estes Express Lines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Evideo Owners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Angel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  4. National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Northern California Power Agency v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API