Legal Opinion
Estes Express Lines v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 3, 2014No. 2013-5056PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Estes Express Lines (“Estes”) appeals from a final order of the Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) dismissing Estes’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Estes Express Lines v. United States, 108 Fed.Cl. 416 (2018). For the reasons below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Background
Estes, a federal motor carrier, seeks to recover from the Government freight charges incurred by Marine Corps Community Services (“MCCS”). The charges in question correspond to shipments arranged on behalf of MCCS by a freight broker, Salem Logistics (“Salem”),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Stephens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Creative Management Services v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Agility Logistics Servs. Co. KSC v. MattisCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.