Legal Opinion
National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 5, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0745Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-745 (ESH) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, organizations and individuals who have paid fees to obtain records through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system (PACER), claim that PACER’s fee schedule is higher than necessary to cover the costs of operating PACER and therefore violates the E- Government Act of 2002,
Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205(e), 116 Stat. 2899, 2915 (codified as 28 U.S.C § 1913 note).…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.