Legal Opinion
National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 24, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0745PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs, organizations and individuals who have paid fees to obtain records through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system (PACER), claim that PACER’s fee schedule is higher than necessary to cover the costs of operating PACER and therefore violates the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205(e), 116 Stat. 2899, 2915 (codified as 28 U.S.C § 1913 note). (Compl. at 2, ECF No. 1.) They have brought this class action against the United States under the Little Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a), to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Garza v. HarganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Acadiana Management Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Afghan and Iraqi Allies v. PompeoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- CAMPBELL v. THE COUNTY OF MERCERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.