Legal Opinion
In re Auction Houses Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 3, 2000No. 00 Civ. 0648 LAKPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Although the press has reported that an agreement has been reached to settle these cases, subject to court approval, the proposed settlement (which has not yet been filed with the Court) in fact would not resolve two of the cases, Kruman v. Christie’s International, 00 Civ. 6322(LAK), and Burkle v. Christie’s Inc., 00 Civ. 7018(LAK), which are brought on behalf of a class of persons who dealt with defendants abroad. Discovery still is underway in those actions, thus requiring this ruling.
I
The general nature of this case is set forth in two prior…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- In re Auction Houses Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In re Auction Houses Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Cullins v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Jacoby v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation M.D.L. No. 1775District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.