Legal Opinion
In re Auction Houses Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 20, 2000No. 00CIV.0648(LAK)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these consolidated class actions seek damages and other relief for alleged price fixing in violation of the antitrust laws. The matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to certify a plaintiff class.
Facts
Except as otherwise noted, the following discussion assumes the truth of the allegations of the complaint.1 It is not to be construed as containing findings of fact with respect to plaintiffs’ substantive allegations.
Defendants Sotheby’s Holding, Inc. and its subsidiary Sotheby’s Inc. (collectively “Sotheby’s”) and Christie’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Livengood Feeds, Inc. v. KgaaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- In Re West Virginia Rezulin LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. McCaffery v. HutchisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.