State v. McNally
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction of assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (l).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal because the state failed to produce sufficient evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the assault, (2) excluded expert opinion testimony as to the intoxication of certain witnesses, and (3) excluded evidence concerning the victim’s civil action against the defendant’s father. We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. PjuraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Mazurek v. Town of East HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Mroczek v. KretConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.