Legal Opinion

Mroczek v. Kret

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 20, 2004No. AC 23911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

In this personal injury action, the plaintiff, Zofia Mroczek, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a juiy verdict in favor of the defendant, Tadeusz Kret. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly barred her engineering expert from testifying that in his opinion, the area in which the plaintiff fell was unsafe.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*130The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our discussion of the issue on appeal. On October 9, 1999, the plaintiff visited the home of the defendant. Between the hours…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Taylor v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  5. Gaulton v. Reno Paint & Wallpaper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Czajkowski v. YMCA of Metropolitan Hartford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API