Mroczek v. Kret
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this personal injury action, the plaintiff, Zofia Mroczek, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a juiy verdict in favor of the defendant, Tadeusz Kret. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly barred her engineering expert from testifying that in his opinion, the area in which the plaintiff fell was unsafe.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*130The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our discussion of the issue on appeal. On October 9, 1999, the plaintiff visited the home of the defendant. Between the hours…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Taylor v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Gaulton v. Reno Paint & Wallpaper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Czajkowski v. YMCA of Metropolitan Hartford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014