State v. Greenfield
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The defendant, Rofio Greenfield, raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court improperly denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence as the fruit of an illegal seizure; (2) whether the trial court improperly found probable cause to prosecute the defendant for murder; and (3) whether the trial court improperly denied the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal due to insufficient evidence of his intent to kill.
The defendant was charged with the crime of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a).1 In a hearing held pursuant to article first, § 8,2 of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Guardians Assn. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.