Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Libowitz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 1930No. [No. 33, January Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPabke, J.

As the statute enacted in the matter of removal of causes is in harmony with the terms of the Constitution (Code, art. 75, secs. 109-111; art. 5, sec, 27; art. 24, sec. 1; Fountain v. State, 135 Md. 87, 91), the question on this appeal is whether a petition for a writ of mandamus can be removed for trial under the provisions of the Constitution on that subject.

The original Constitution of the State of Maryland contained no provision for the removal of a pending litigation Lorn one court to another for trial until an amendment, which was submitted by chapter 55 of the Acts of 1804, entitled…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. George's Creek Coal & Iron Co. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Manly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  4. Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  5. Knee v. Baltimore City Passenger Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davidson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. StephansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Bullock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Greenberg v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API