Legal Opinion

Slacum v. Jolley

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 10, 1927PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

This proceeding arises under article 101 of the Code, known as the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Raleigh Jolley, a colored man, thirty-seven years old, having a wife and one child, was, on June 4th, 1925, employed as a “bus driver” by Oolona Slacum, who1 operated “bus” lines between Cambridge, Salisbury, and Hurlock, in Maryland. On that day, which was extremely warm, he was engaged in driving a thirty-six horse power Studebaker automobile. In the course of the day he complained of the heat, and, when he returned to his home at five o’clock in. the afternoon, he seemed tired and worn, declined…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  2. Gordon v. OpaleckyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Bogatsky v. SwerdlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. Northern Central Railway Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Wilmer v. Light Street Savings & Building Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Ex Rel. CastrandaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Kucharczyk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Pittman v. Atlantic Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Eisenhower v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API