Bullock v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.
The question presented in these cases is whether the petitioners (Donald Bullock and Charles L. DuDonis), 1 who are presently confined in the Patuxent Institution, are entitled to remove the petitions they filed, for a redetermination of the status of each as a defective delinquent, from the Criminal Court of Baltimore to some other court for hearing.
The question to be decided is before us on the motion of the State to dismiss the appeals of the petitioners from identical orders of the Circuit Court for Howard County (to which the petitions had been removed) remanding the petitions for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Blizzard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Heslop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Perkins v. EskridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Lang v. CattertonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- In Re FletcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.