State v. Soriano
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In these consolidated contempt ’ cases, defendants refused to testify before a grand jury investigating a possible burglary at the General Store in Klamath Falls, claiming their right under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution 1 not to be compelled to testify against themselves. After extensive proceedings, the trial court granted them use and derivative use immunity under ORS 136.617-136.619 2 and ordered them to testify. They persisted in their refusals, claiming that the statutory immunity was insufficient to replace their constitutional right and that only transactional…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. VondehnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.