Legal Opinion

Houston ex rel. Houston v. Teter

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 1985No. 49469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Judge.

The key issue in this appeal is whether appellant Jonathan Houston preserved for review his claim of error that the verdicts of the jury were so inconsistent as to require reversal. This court finds that the issue was not preserved for appellate review and therefore affirms the judgment.

Jonathan Houston, by his mother and next friend, Suzanne Houston, brought a personal injury action in one count against respondent Ivan Teter after a motor vehicle collision in which the motor vehicle occupied by Jonathan Houston was struck in the rear by a motor vehicle driven by Teter. Suzanne…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cargill Inc., Commodity Marketing Division v. HaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Shaffer v. Terrydale Management Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Johnson v. Estate of GirvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Boland v. DehnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Pittman v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tobb v. Menorah Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. First Place, Inc. v. Douglas Toyota III, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Wilferth v. PruettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Eagle v. Redmond Building Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Walck v. NosserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API