Boland v. Dehn
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
This is an action on an open account for a balance claimed to be due of $2,458.86, which was tried before the court without a jury. Judgment below was in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants in the sum of $138.88, from which judgment plaintiff has duly appealed.
The briefs of the parties present a unique situation. By the first point in their own brief defendants criticize plaintiff’s brief as failing to comply with the Rules, in that (1) under his points relied on plaintiff failed to allege any error on the part of the trial court; and (2), plaintiff’s points…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Turner v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Merrick v. Bridgeways, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Scott v. Parkview Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Hancock v. CrouchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DrakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Farrell v. DeClueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Milliken v. Trianon Hotel CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Interstate Collection Agency, Inc. v. KuntzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.