Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Reynolds

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1984No. WD 35172PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Presiding Judge.

This is a proceeding for modification of a divorce decree in which respondent, the former wife, sought and was granted an increase in child support payments from appellant and attorney fees. After the order was entered setting the amount of child support and allowing the fees, appellant filed successive motions seeking rehearing by the trial court. Those motions were overruled and, on this appeal, the appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to grant the relief requested in the motions. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction to consider the subject…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Joplin v. Joplin Water Works CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. KendrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Cady v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Haywood v. HaywoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Moore v. Rollmo Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allison v. Sverdrup & Parcel & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Payne v. MarkesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. White v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Rauh v. Interco, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Ridley v. NewsomeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API