Legal Opinion

Walck v. Nosser

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1989No. 54655Published

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

In this jury tried case, defendant appeals from the judgment entered against him for fraudulent misrepresentation in the sale of an automobile. We affirm.

Defendant raises three points of error. First, the trial court erred in giving a punitive damage instruction, because punitive damages are not recoverable on an odometer fraud claim brought pursuant to § 407.511 et seq., RSMo 1986. Since the case was submitted under a common law fraud count rather than the statutory count, there was no error. Second, the trial court erred in giving the punitive damage instruction,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heitman v. Brown Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Stewart v. K-Mart Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Gollwitzer v. TheodoroMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Dover v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Houston ex rel. Houston v. TeterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API