Inhabitants of Ellsworth v. Inhabitants of Waltham
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
An action brought under Sec. 71, Chap. 19, E. S., to recover for supplies and medical attendance furnished an indigent family during quarantine. The verdict was for the plaintiff. The ease is before this court on defendant’s exceptions and a motion for a new trial on the usual grounds.
*215It is admitted that the supplies were furnished and the quarantine was in the interest of public health, and the only question involved is the pauper settlement of Charles A. Emerson, who, it is admitted, had a derivative settlement in the defendant town.
In a previous action, 122 Maine, 356, the city of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. O'ConnorIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Patty v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Fredericks v. JudahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Jacob Tome Institute v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
3Cited by4 opinions
- Inhabitants of Gouldsboro v. Inhabitants of SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Connolly v. SerunianSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
- Inhabitants of Fort Fairfield v. Inhabitants of MillinocketSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
- State v. AyersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983