Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Serunian

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 17, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

On exceptions to acceptance of referee’s report. The action is on an “account annexed” wherein recovery is sought for services performed and disbursements made by Joseph E. F. Connolly as attorney for the defendant. It was brought by him, but upon his death his wife, Margaret B. Connolly, came in as administratrix to prosecute the action. The referee found for the plaintiff.

That the services were performed and disbursements made as set forth in the account is not denied. The only defense set up is the statute of limitations. Section 90, Chap. 95, II. S. 1930, provides:

“The following actions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1849
  2. City of Rockland v. FarnsworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  3. Inhabitants of Rumford v. Inhabitants of UptonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  4. Inhabitants of Ellsworth v. Inhabitants of WalthamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
  5. Inhabitants of Monroe v. Inhabitants of HampdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Angell v. HALLEESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Patten v. MilamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Siegemund v. ShaplandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  4. Levasseur v. AaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. Levasseur v. AaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API