Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Ayers

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 9, 1983Published

1DissentNichols, Justice

I cannot agree with today’s majority when in such cavalier fashion it permits the former testimony of a witness, Donald Ayers, to be admitted into evidence against the Defendant, Barbara Thibodeau Ayers, in this, her second trial for murder.

The witness’s testimony at the earlier trial was nothing but hearsay at this trial. Its admission into evidence by the Superior Court was a violation of the Defendant’s right of confrontation guaranteed to her by Amendment VI (through Amendment XIV) of the United States Constitution.

In a very limited way our Maine Rules of Evidence (tracking the Federal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. L. K. Peterson and William H. Scott, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. Frank Wingate and Kenneth Luke SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API