Inhabitants of Fort Fairfield v. Inhabitants of Millinocket
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.
In this pauper suit, the defendant rested its case on the evidence introduced by the plaintiff and moved for a directed verdict. This was denied and exception reserved. The jury then, under instructions, returned a verdict for the plaintiff and excep*428tion to that-ruling was noted. The case comes forward on these exceptions and a general motion for a new trial on the usual grounds.
The question raised by the exception to the ruling by which the jury was ordered to return a verdict for the plaintiff is whether the jury would have been warranted by the evidence in finding a verdict contrary to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Inhabitants of Gouldsboro v. Inhabitants of SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Inhabitants of Ellsworth v. Inhabitants of WalthamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
- Inhabitants of Monroe v. Inhabitants of HampdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- Royal v. Bar Harbor & Union River Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
- Bishop v. Inhabitants of the Town of HermonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Colvin v. BarrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Palleria v. Farrin Bros. & SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Inhabitants of Town of Bethel v. INHABITANTS, ETC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955