Legal Opinion

Dias v. Vanek

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1984No. 9213, 9254PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WAKATSUKI, J.

Two questions arise out of Cases No. 9213 and No. 9254 which were consolidated and tried on the merits before a jury in the first circuit court. In Case No. 9213, the question is whether the trial court erred in adding the Buyers’ $20,000 down payment to the jury verdict of $6,263 as damages to the Sellers as the result of the Buyers’ breach of an Agreement of Sale. We hold that error was committed and remand for the determination of only the amount of damages. In Case No. 9254, the question is whether the trial court erred in the amount of attorney’s fees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Sanchez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. House of Pasta, Inc. v. MayoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Coney v. Lihue Plantation Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Richards v. Dravo Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Knodle v. Waikiki Gateway Hotel, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Costales v. RoseteHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Kanahele v. HANHawaii Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API